You academics and economists don’t have a clue what Americans can do because you won’t talk to them #h1b

Trump’s opposition to H-1B visas has experts concerned about filling high-skilled jobs

Economists and academics weigh in on the impact US President-elect Donald Trump could have on H-1B visas, which pave a route for skilled labor to fill tech jobs in America.

I am so sick of people like this saying there are no skilled Americans when they write from the security of a steady paycheck and the sanctuary of a office.

I’ve got more tech skills in my middle finger than they do, but they will not let Displaced Americans prove them wrong because it might jeopardize their steady paycheck and everybody knows that our tech industry will pay them more for saying that there are no qualified Americans and they will pay them less if they stand up for Americans and America.

One question I would like to ask of Adams Nager, economic policy analyst at ITIF.

Are you an American or not?

Why do you not stand up for your fellow citizens?

Why doesn’t Todd Schulte and stand up for the American citizens that they have displaced in favor of #h1b ?

That is a question that I would love to ask them with millions of American software Developers who have been displaced by the companies that represents.

Yet it’s clear is concerned. President Todd Schulte followed up the initial statement with a second plea to “stand up for your beliefs, stand with the communities who need you right now, stand for those who can’t stand for themselves and remember that a lot of people don’t have the option to walk away from this fight.” It’s not just the lobbying groups, but investors as well that fear a Trump presidency may adversely affect the industry. Technology stocks are down across the boardthis week for some of the biggest companies on the planet, including Amazon, Google, and Facebook.

The urgency comes from the uncertainties of a Trump administration, but also the personal stakes. The CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, is an immigrant. As are Google co-founder Sergey Brin and Microsoft chief Satya Nadella. The entire Silicon Valley philosophy rests on the idea of rewarding individuals for hard work, talent, and ingenuity — regardless of race, class, or country of origin. Trump’s vague immigration policy proposals threaten this worldview. In a very material way, they also threaten the workforces of both the juggernauts and startups of the tech industry that use the H-1B and other visa programs to expand talent searches around the globe.


Is President Trump already hiring a wolf to guard the flock?

For some time I have wondered why the EEOC has not gone after those companies who are using caste to discriminate against Americans in America.

I believe I now know why they have been asleep at the wheel.

In the rumored short list for cabinet picks, the sole name mentioned for Sec. of Labor is Victoria Lipnic, currently EEOC Commissioner. At first glance, it would seem nice of the Trump team to consider an Obama appointee. However, her bio says, “Immediately before coming to the EEOC, Commissioner Lipnic was of counsel to the law firm of Seyfarth Shaw LLP in its Washington, DC, office.” Well, who is that?

Seyfarth Shaw is a large law firm specializing on employment issues — from the employers’ point of view. In particular, one of their areas of practice is business immigration, and one of their partners in that area is Angelo Paparelli, one of the most prominent immigration lawyers in the nation. He frequently writes and speaks in favor of H-1B.


I am doing my part to Make America Great Again

I applied, Did you?

Serve America

Thank you for your interest in learning about the process for joining the President Elect’s transition effort.  Please find below the information regarding the application process and instructions.

President Elect Trump has promised to change Washington, DC and that will start with identifying and recruiting the finest men and women from across the country to serve in his Administration.   Any individual who wishes to serve the Administration should utilize this online application in order to participate.

The President Elect will make appointments for a variety of positions throughout the federal government; some will require Senate confirmation, while others will not.  Appointments that require Senate confirmation include the Cabinet, subcabinet, members of regulatory commissions, ambassadorships, judgeships, as well as members of numerous advisory boards.


Service in the Trump-Pence Administration will be service to our Nation and thus a high honor, which demands both sacrifice and dedication.  There are many factors to consider:

  • The time commitment is significant and the pace is fast
  • Appointments and jobs of the Trump-Pence Administration are demanding, and the application process is rigorous

President Elect Trump appreciates your interest and willingness to serve.

For most applicants under serious consideration:

  • A full FBI background check in which an applicants history of employment, personal, travel, medical, financial, legal, military and education background will likely take.
  • Consideration is taken for possible conflicts of interest. Financial holdings and sources of income must be disclosed.Any conflicts must be remedied by divestiture, the creation of special trusts, and other actions.
  • Many appointees’ dealings with the Federal government both during and for a period of time after their service will be significantly restricted to prevent possible conflicts of interest.


All those wishing to apply for positions in the Trump-Pence Transition, Executive Office of the President, or a Federal Department, Agency or Commission should follow the instructions below:

  • Complete the online application and submit it electronically.You will be notified electronically once your information has been received.A record of your application will be maintained while the President is in office, and you will be considered for the position(s) or subject area(s) which you have expressed interest in whenever openings occur.
  • You will be asked fill out a Personal Data Statement if you are considered for a specific position.  You will be asked about possible conflicts of interest deriving from your sources of income; all aspects of your personal and professional life, including organization which you belong or once belonged; speeches you may have given and books, articles and editorials you may have written; legal, administrative and regulatory proceedings to which you may have been a party; in short, anything that might embarrass the President or you if he should choose you for a position in his administration.
  • If you are considered for a nomination by the President Elect, you will be asked to complete FBI and financial disclosure forms for review and consideration. The types of forms you may be required to fill out are as follows: for National Security Positions (SF86) and for higher-level positions, the financial disclosure form, (SF278).Most appointees are required to file financial disclosure statements annually during their term of service.
  • If Senate confirmation is required for the position you are nominated for, the Senate committee that reviews those nominations may ask you to provide additional information.

One should assume that all of the information provided during this process is ultimately subject to public disclosure, if requested under the Freedom of Information Act.


Tim Cook, when Apple refuses to water the garden in America, the garden dies and our children are that garden #h1b

Other issues addressed in the Microsoft blog include the need for investment in infrastructure such as highways and bridges and the link between diversity and economic success. “Over a third of our engineers have come from other countries – 157 countries, in fact,” Smith wrote. “We have employees from every race, ethnic background and religion.  If there’s a language spoken on the planet, there’s a good chance that it’s spoken by an employee at Microsoft.”

Gary Shapiro, president of the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), which represents over 2,200 consumer technology companies, also cited the need for improved infrastructure and effective immigration policies in a Fortune column Wednesday. “To attract and retain the best and brightest workers, the U.S. must increase the number of H-1B visas for highly skilled immigrants,” he wrote.

Americans were the best and brightest and still are.

But when our companies hire only H-1B non-immigrant guest workers, that denies the children of America the opportunity to grow.

Many of those children will not even realize their potential until a mentor shows them what they can do.

And our tech industry is hell bent on denying them that opportunity.

As an example, I would put myself up against any manager in any of the tech industry companies, but I am not given that opportunity because of age discrimination and caste and because at the ripe young age of 17 I chose to serve my country rather than go to college.

How many others are being denied the opportunity to compete?

Have we forgotten already what made us the country that everybody else wants to become a citizen of?

life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement” regardless of social class or circumstances of birth


Indian enterprises lose a third of data during disruptions and power outages: study – #h1b

Interesting submission from Walter N.


Indian enterprises lose an average of 37 percent data during disruptions and power outages, 53 percent of which is attributed to IT hardware failures, according to a study conducted by Zerto and Ovum.

(The year now is 2016.   Half of all the lost data is caused by “IT hardware failures” in a century when all the electronics are solid state devices sealed in hard cases and untouchable.   No delicate vacuum tubes.  No unsealed disk plates.   Wiring insulation on stationary circuits is perfect.   Connectors with gold contacts are perfect and sealed.     How can these numbers be believed?   Worse still,  why are they bragging about these numbers in paragraph one?)

The survey also revealed that over 50 percent of Indian enterprises have a formal disaster recovery programme in place to protect their enterprises     while (only) a third of the CIOs surveyed have multiple disaster recovery sites to back them up.     31 percent of the Indian enterprises surveyed consider cloud-based solutions for disaster recovery as an option.

(So the other 50 percent of Indian enterprises do NOT have a formal disaster recovery program in place.    Nobody cares apparently.   It is not their own data.   The data at risk belongs to the Americans.    India’s disaster quickly becomes the USA’s disaster.   I have read about it.    Recall  the UK’s NHS $4B disaster,    RBS Royal Bank of Scotland ATM’s down for weeks,  State of Texas,   Baggage piles,   Airline shutdowns,  etc.   )

The report, ‘New catalysts setting the pace for disaster recovery initiatives’ analyses the findings of a survey that interviewed 400 enterprises from eight countries in the region: Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and Taiwan.     The biggest causes of disruption are natural disasters (55 percent) and IT hardware failure (55 percent), followed by power failures (45 percent) and network failures (43 percent).

(So these 8 countries have accounted for their biggest negative issues which are caused by natural disaster [their word],  IT hardware,  electric power,  and Network causes.     Apparently we are to assume that the missing 45% that are causing disruptions are caused by human incompetence.

This is “setting the pace” for disaster [their word] recovery in 400 enterprises.

Reads to me like an environment that I would not want my business  to depend on. )

57 percent of them committed to cloud architecture infrastructure when it comes to data centre spends and investment opportunities.    
(See related supporting logic July 12, 2016.)

Findings across Asia-Pacific
72 percent of the organisations across Asia-Pacific experienced at least an hour of data loss after a disruption, with 33 percent experiencing a loss of one to five hours of data.

“The findings of this report show that no company is immune to a potential outage or disaster    and in the event this does strike, the first few minutes are critical to recovering as quickly as possible,” said Andrew Martin, Managing Director, Asia-Pacific and Japan, Zerto.

Andrew added, “Organisations across the Asia-Pacific region need the ability to revert back to minutes before an outage, ensuring they have up-to-date resources and files.    This is how disaster recovery plans really need to evolve to an IT resilience strategy to avoid not only downtime but the risk of brand damage and potential customer loss.    IT resilience ensures that from a customer or end-user perspective, there is no interruption to service.”

(So these 8 countries – their customer can not tolerate any interruption to service.  “no interruption”.    Zero.

However,    merely the “loss” of 5 hours of data is acceptable.     How much data is active in 5 hours of time?   Who measures with these units?

Is “loss” of 5 hours significant to the 5 hour morning issuings of new Drivers Licenses from 8am to 1pm ?    Maybe one Drivers License every 20 minutes.    3 every hour.   15 missing Driver’s Licenses inside their computer on average each event.   Is that “loss” significant?    I say 15 is a  WOW  unacceptable answer.

Maybe some Motor Vehicle Department can tolerate those data losses.

Pharmaceuticals is a clearer example.
What about 300 opioid tablets into each bottle when the machine can fill 1,000 bottles an hour for 5 hours?   (300 per X 5,000 bottles =  Is that loss of data on 1,500,000 opioid tablets still acceptable?    No big deal for 33 percent of these 400 companies.   33 percent is 132 companies don’t care.

Well,  I care.    OFFSHORING is a quality disaster.     The CLOUD ditto.    But they brag about it.    They name the countries.   They count the companies.   They publish the collective numbers.   They brag.)

Over 45 percent of enterprises in Asia-Pacific consider disaster recovery software a top data centre investment priority, ranking it third behind cloud architecture and infrastructure and security.

(Disaster Recovery is merely the 3rd priority for scarce investment funds.
CLOUD architecture was
2nd,  or a higher priority.   [layouts of a hierarchical nature done on paper]
Infrastructure in
1st place [hard goods which have mass.   Racks.  Lights.  Raised Floors.  Etc.]  and
Security after I count 3rd to 2nd to 1st and I have reached
zero priority.   Illogical.   Strange.   Security has to be cameras, locks, alarms, badges, impressive looking logo.   Imitate the Rock of Gibraltar.

“Disaster Recovery” was an after-thought.    Low priority.    Like fire insurance.    The importance goes up after the first large claim is filed.   Otherwise it is the 5th item in line.   It did not even rate having an assigned number.   It got number zero   because the whole prioritization scale was numbered illogically backwards.     In one sentence it is the “top” priority, while in the same sentence it is placed least important lowest of the group.)

79 percent of enterprises recognise customer expectation as the biggest driving force for increased spending on disaster recovery, making it the top factor in Asia-Pacific.    Other major factors driving disaster recovery spend include digital initiatives (68 percent), increased mobile usage (67 percent), stricter regulatory requirements (67 percent), and increased cyber-attacks (66 percent).

Ovum believes that the disaster recovery market will move to a new growth phase and a new generation of software-defined and cloud-ready solutions.    This move is seeing business and IT leaders making disaster recovery an essential element of infrastructure strategy discussions.

(This entire article which is full of bragging is now understandable.    This magazine article “study” is actually a sales pitch promoting DRaaS, a new business product to sell.    Disaster Recovery as a Service.

Somebody throws the risk over the fence and decides to let somebody else worry about it.    Works great.     But …

Only problem is, — when that secondary outfit fails to do the job,  it is your business which goes out of business due to a Disaster which failed to accomplish a Recovery.    For the incompetent failing outfit,  failing is not a crime.)

Adrian Ho, Principal Analyst at Ovum Asia-Pacific, said, “Customer expectation is recognised as the biggest driving force; these are the customers who are also very unforgiving if enterprises are caught short on disaster recovery capabilities in an event of outage of any nature.”

19 percent of enterprises in Asia-Pacific have already deployed a cloud solution when outsourcing their disaster recovery.    A further 17 percent will implement Disaster Recovery as a Service (DRaaS) over the next 12 months, and 29 percent are considering DRaaS with no firm plans.    This suggests that a majority of enterprises in Asia-Pacific will adopt DRaaS over the next 12 to 36 months.

(Disasters are not typically simple like this article’s title.   Not merely data “disruptions”    and power failures.

Disasters can be earthquakes   involving complete loss of computer hardware,  databases, and the building housing all of that.    There can be complete loss of electric power infrastructure,  and the data connection network.
Remember the data connection network likely crosses oceans.     Most critically there can be a sudden total loss of one third of the skilled personnel.   Eight hours out of 24 hours.    There can even be the sudden total loss of all the skilled personnel    if both offices and residential apartments are simultaneously destroyed.    Imagine sudden  loss of all of the data architecture diagrams and layouts.    Knowledge gone.     Think of the impressive system charts which were thumb-tacked to the no longer existing cubicle walls.

It is a disaster when your Information Systems building is suddenly a 30 foot high pile of smoking rubble    jiggling throughout a following month of aftershocks.

This article is pathetic.

Is the critical DATA for backing up synchronised to a specific CCYYMMDDHHMMSST and kept offsite and safe?    Is it out of the country?   Is it out of the continent?   Is it above ground and vulnerable or underground with multiple secure access entrances?     We are not told any of that.     India, relying on the CLOUD inside India    is hardly adequate when the disaster is an earthquake.    Or,  conceivably a nuclear exchange with a nearby neighbor   —  that might cost  say Milwaukee Wisconsin all of it’s city property tax records.

Hurricane Katrina was a Category 5 and it affected two states,  with concentrated destruction to an entire single city.   The death toll in just those two states was 1,836 people.

In comparison,  Nepal’s April 2015 earthquake killed 8,019 people, with 17,866 injured.     Mount Everest actually moved a measurable amount of distance.   3 Centimeters horizontally.

Imagine trying to accomplish  system Disaster Recovery of your CLOUD based essentials in the midst of an  earthquake situation which happened 12,000 miles distant.   With ground liquification.   With fires, dust and flooding.

Is the lost hardware, the physical databases,  and the replacement network available instantly to replace the lost same ?     Never forget that CHEAP had been the original goal.    Idle equipment is expensive.    Shared equipment is less expensive but every nut and bolt must match to the partner doing the sharing.   Maintenance is a nightmare.   Even harder when separated by half of the globe.     Obsolescence still is expensive.

This is not yet even considering the lost vital data which was spinning on those servers.   Delicate equipment does not bounce well from falls.   Delicate equipment does not tolerate temperature extremes and dust and polluted water.    Why is that important?    You can assume there will be no recovery of data from such bounced hardware.

Data loss is not acceptable at any number higher than zero.    Can a Motor Vehicle Department lose data?   A hospital ?   A prison ?   An insurance company ?   A bank ?    An airline ?   A single airliner missing in an ocean is searched for almost endlessly.    A single United States Marine lost on a battlefield in the Pacific seven decades ago is cherished when identifiable remains are found and returned to the USA.    Amelia Earhart is still being searched for.    Data is critical.

Five hours of data loss is not accepted anywhere that I have ever been associated with.     But, in India, they brag about losing 37% of data.    They write …  “72 percent of the organisations across Asia-Pacific experienced at least an hour of data loss after a disruption,     with 33 percent experiencing a loss of one to five hours of data.

I speak English.   We are not talking here about data delayed.   The word being used is “loss”.   Paragraph one.  Sentence one.   The third word.

Recovery requires knowledgeable people.     Your India employee’s loyalties have never been toward you and your flag and country.    Their loyalties were to paychecks from you.    Following a disaster,  their attention will be toward their own family and those disaster issues.    The hypothetical earthquake disaster happened in their country.    The real disaster of your business without computers comes back to the USA.

The likely unavailability of Skype due to overload or destruction     combined with the brittleness of India telephone wiring systems    is also discomforting.   Cellphone towers can topple.   Cellphone systems can get overloaded with users who are trying to solve for a massive regional disaster.

Are the skilled and suddenly unavailable personnel     being backed up with other skilled personnel who are standing by ready to go to work ?     Where are they?    Will speaking languages be an issue?    Will reading and writing be an issue?    If you need to train people – who is going to have the information and knowledge to impart to others?      This time, you Mister OFFSHORER do not have the weapon of threatened loss of Severance “Bonus” to induce trainers for 90 days.     Those who were formerly your loyal workforce back in the days of American prosperity — those people see your name come up in their Telephone CallerID and they let the phone go to the answering machine.

If disaster recovery takes a full year to accomplish,   can the bank or the insurance company or any government agency (for instance, MVD or a Licensing Department or Security organization)  on the far side of the globe  operate for a year without having their OFFSHORED “IT” system?    Blank computer screens.

Earthquakes do not give you warnings.

Have you ever actually run a full scale Disaster Recovery with a padlock on your entire existing system ?    Circuit Breakers to ALL of your equipment turned to OFF     and Circuit Breaker Cabinet Door padlocked shut.     The padlock click sound signifies the clock moment of the disaster happening.

Schedule such a test for overseas.     Make it an unannounced surprise on Friday of this week at 3:07pm local time, and begin a stopwatch running.    Keep that stopwatch timer running until the backup is up and synchronized.

Your biggest corporation issue is not going to be a mere loss of 5 hours of data.

Will your corporation or government survive the padlock test?
I do not think so.

Will you as the responsible executive survive the padlock test?
I again do not think so.

This magazine “Contact Us” . . .    Come meet our team at:
YourStory Bengaluru Office
#259, 6th Cross Rd, 2nd Main,
Indiranagar, 1st Stage
Bengaluru, Karnataka 560038
LandMark – Indiranagar BDA complex road
Phone – 080-46573636


The ignorance of Yahoo Finance astounds me

Immigration was perhaps the most contentious issue of the 2016 presidential election.

What astounds me is that the “Immigration” that Yahoo finance and other sites talk about is not Immigration.

Click to zoom in

Click to zoom in

Notice how immigration was 531,463 in 2015?

Yet non-immigration was 10,891,745?

These are the folks that are being brought in to Displace Americans in America using what I call a H-1B Hunting License.

You can see why I call it a hunting license by clicking here.

This is the type of Immigration that will help America grow and build a country with opportunity for all Americans to be all that they can be.


Now let me show you why the unlimited illegal and non-immigration is bad for the future of American citizens in America.

It all starts with jobs, and places like Yahoo Finance are too lazy to do even the most basic research which is to look at the total nonfarm payroll totals from start to present day.

Click to zoom in

Click to zoom in

That red line shows the high point we hit before this recession.

Notice how we have created few if any jobs above that point?

A thinking man or woman at this point would realize that is not good for the future of their children and they would wonder how many are full time jobs and part time jobs.

Click to zoom in

Click to zoom in

This guy has done a great job of breaking it down for us.

Now, once a person immigrates to America they become an American citizen, so lets look at the jobs that have gone to the American citizen.

Click to zoom in

Click to zoom in

Here again, we use that red line to show where we were at in 2007 at that high point.

As you can see, people who have immigrated to America and those that were born in America have gotten a few jobs.

Now lets take a look at what the Non-Immigrant Guest Workers have gotten when it comes to jobs.

Click to zoom in

Click to zoom in

If you have any type of brain at all, you can tell that the lions share of the jobs that have been created have gone to these NON-IMMIGRANT Guest workers.

I think this is wrong.

So I fight it.

Not with propaganda.

But with hard data that our own government maintains.